This commit is contained in:
parent
24aca6746f
commit
24ed36d0a7
5 changed files with 9 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -45,9 +45,8 @@ We will see that not every analytic set is Borel.
|
||||||
\begin{remark}
|
\begin{remark}
|
||||||
In the definition we can replace the assertion that
|
In the definition we can replace the assertion that
|
||||||
$f$ is continuous
|
$f$ is continuous
|
||||||
by the weaker assertion of $f$ being Borel.
|
by the weaker assertion of $f$ being Borel.%
|
||||||
\todo{Copy exercise from sheet 5}
|
\footnote{use \yaref{thm:clopenize}, cf.~\yaref{s6e2}}
|
||||||
% TODO WHY?
|
|
||||||
\end{remark}
|
\end{remark}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{theorem}
|
\begin{theorem}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ U_{\epsilon}(x,y) \coloneqq \{f \in X^X : d(x,f(y)) < \epsilon\}.
|
||||||
for all $x,y \in X$, $\epsilon > 0$.
|
for all $x,y \in X$, $\epsilon > 0$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
$X^{X}$ is a compact Hausdorff space.
|
$X^{X}$ is a compact Hausdorff space.
|
||||||
\begin{remark}
|
\begin{remark}%
|
||||||
\todo{Copy from exercise sheet 10}
|
\footnote{cf.~\yaref{s11e1}}
|
||||||
Let $f_0 \in X^X$ be fixed.
|
Let $f_0 \in X^X$ be fixed.
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\item $X^X \ni f \mapsto f \circ f_0$
|
\item $X^X \ni f \mapsto f \circ f_0$
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||||
\lecture{20}{2024-01-09}{The Infinite Torus}
|
\lecture{20}{2024-01-09}{The Infinite Torus}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\gist{
|
||||||
\begin{example}
|
\begin{example}
|
||||||
\footnote{This is the same as \yaref{ex:19:inftorus},
|
\footnote{This is the same as \yaref{ex:19:inftorus},
|
||||||
but with new notation.}
|
but with new notation.}
|
||||||
|
@ -17,6 +18,7 @@
|
||||||
In the lecture both notations were used. % to make things extra confusing.
|
In the lecture both notations were used. % to make things extra confusing.
|
||||||
Here I'll try to only use multiplicative notation.
|
Here I'll try to only use multiplicative notation.
|
||||||
\end{remark}
|
\end{remark}
|
||||||
|
}{}
|
||||||
We will be studying projections to the first $d$ coordinates,
|
We will be studying projections to the first $d$ coordinates,
|
||||||
i.e.
|
i.e.
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ form a $\sigma$-algebra).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Let $(U_n)_{n < \omega}$ be a countable base of $(X,\tau)$.
|
Let $(U_n)_{n < \omega}$ be a countable base of $(X,\tau)$.
|
||||||
Each $U_n$ is open, hence Borel,
|
Each $U_n$ is open, hence Borel,
|
||||||
so by a theorem from the lecture$^{\text{tm}}$
|
so by \hyperref[thm:clopenize]{a theorem from the lecture™}
|
||||||
there exists a Polish topology $\tau_n$
|
there exists a Polish topology $\tau_n$
|
||||||
such that $U_n$ is clopen, preserving Borel sets.
|
such that $U_n$ is clopen, preserving Borel sets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ amounts to a finite number of conditions on the preimage.
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
is closed as an intersection of clopen sets.
|
is closed as an intersection of clopen sets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Clearly $\pr_{LO(\N)}(\cF)$ is the complement
|
Clearly $\proj_{LO(\N)}(\cF)$ is the complement
|
||||||
of $WO(\N)$, hence $WO(\N)$ is coanalytic.
|
of $WO(\N)$, hence $WO(\N)$ is coanalytic.
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
\nr 4
|
\nr 4
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue