diff --git a/inputs/lecture_09.tex b/inputs/lecture_09.tex index d3b2af2..d305928 100644 --- a/inputs/lecture_09.tex +++ b/inputs/lecture_09.tex @@ -45,9 +45,8 @@ We will see that not every analytic set is Borel. \begin{remark} In the definition we can replace the assertion that $f$ is continuous - by the weaker assertion of $f$ being Borel. - \todo{Copy exercise from sheet 5} - % TODO WHY? + by the weaker assertion of $f$ being Borel.% + \footnote{use \yaref{thm:clopenize}, cf.~\yaref{s6e2}} \end{remark} \begin{theorem} diff --git a/inputs/lecture_17.tex b/inputs/lecture_17.tex index 9ce36cd..5fe9acb 100644 --- a/inputs/lecture_17.tex +++ b/inputs/lecture_17.tex @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ U_{\epsilon}(x,y) \coloneqq \{f \in X^X : d(x,f(y)) < \epsilon\}. for all $x,y \in X$, $\epsilon > 0$. $X^{X}$ is a compact Hausdorff space. -\begin{remark} - \todo{Copy from exercise sheet 10} +\begin{remark}% + \footnote{cf.~\yaref{s11e1}} Let $f_0 \in X^X$ be fixed. \begin{itemize} \item $X^X \ni f \mapsto f \circ f_0$ diff --git a/inputs/lecture_20.tex b/inputs/lecture_20.tex index bd5690f..27259a1 100644 --- a/inputs/lecture_20.tex +++ b/inputs/lecture_20.tex @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ \lecture{20}{2024-01-09}{The Infinite Torus} +\gist{ \begin{example} \footnote{This is the same as \yaref{ex:19:inftorus}, but with new notation.} @@ -14,9 +15,10 @@ \begin{remark}+ Note that we can identify $S^1$ with a subset of $\C$ (and use multiplication) or with $\faktor{\R}{\Z}$ (and use addition). - In the lecture both notations were used.% to make things extra confusing. + In the lecture both notations were used. % to make things extra confusing. Here I'll try to only use multiplicative notation. \end{remark} +}{} We will be studying projections to the first $d$ coordinates, i.e. \[ diff --git a/inputs/tutorial_07.tex b/inputs/tutorial_07.tex index 820928b..17beb1a 100644 --- a/inputs/tutorial_07.tex +++ b/inputs/tutorial_07.tex @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ form a $\sigma$-algebra). Let $(U_n)_{n < \omega}$ be a countable base of $(X,\tau)$. Each $U_n$ is open, hence Borel, - so by a theorem from the lecture$^{\text{tm}}$ + so by \hyperref[thm:clopenize]{a theorem from the lectureâ„¢} there exists a Polish topology $\tau_n$ such that $U_n$ is clopen, preserving Borel sets. diff --git a/inputs/tutorial_09.tex b/inputs/tutorial_09.tex index 49682d1..801e178 100644 --- a/inputs/tutorial_09.tex +++ b/inputs/tutorial_09.tex @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ amounts to a finite number of conditions on the preimage. \] is closed as an intersection of clopen sets. - Clearly $\pr_{LO(\N)}(\cF)$ is the complement + Clearly $\proj_{LO(\N)}(\cF)$ is the complement of $WO(\N)$, hence $WO(\N)$ is coanalytic. \end{itemize} \nr 4