This commit is contained in:
parent
bcec8f96de
commit
11cdecd1da
6 changed files with 200 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ A flow $\Z \acts X$ corresponds to the graph of
|
|||
and this graph is an element of $K(\bH^2)$.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Beleznay-Foreman]
|
||||
\label{thm:beleznay-foreman}
|
||||
Consider $\Z$-flows.
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item For any $\alpha < \omega_1$,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ However if we pick $y \in Y$, $Ty$ might not be dense.
|
|||
% We want to a minimal subflow in a nice way:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}
|
||||
\label{thm:distalflowpartition}
|
||||
If $(X,T)$ is distal, then $X$ is the disjoint union of minimal subflows.
|
||||
In fact those disjoint sets
|
||||
will be orbits of $E(X,T)$.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -44,9 +44,8 @@ coordinates.
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{lemma}
|
||||
\label{lem:lec20:1}
|
||||
Let $x,x' \in X$ with $\pi_n(x) = \pi_n(x')$
|
||||
for some $n$.
|
||||
Then there is a sequence of points $x_k$ with
|
||||
|
@ -74,7 +73,7 @@ coordinates.
|
|||
\]
|
||||
where $\beta_k$ is such that $\frac{\beta_k}{\pi}$ is irrational
|
||||
and $|\beta_k| < 2^{-k}$.
|
||||
Fix a sequence of such $\beta_k$.
|
||||
Fix a sequence'(b)). of such $\beta_k$.
|
||||
Then
|
||||
\[d(x_k,x) = 2^{-n} |e^{\i \beta_k} - 1| < 2^{-n-k} \xrightarrow{k\to \infty} 0.\]
|
||||
In particular $F(x_k, x) \to 0$.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Let $X_n \coloneqq (S^1)^n$ and $X \coloneqq (S^1)^{\N}$.
|
||||
\begin{theorem}
|
||||
\label{thm:21:xnmaxiso}
|
||||
$(X_n, \tau_n)$ is the maximal isometric extension of $(X_{n-1}, \tau_{n-1})$
|
||||
in $(X,\tau)$.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
|
|
194
inputs/lecture_22.tex
Normal file
194
inputs/lecture_22.tex
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
|
|||
\lecture{22}{2024-01-16}{}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{refproof}{thm:21:xnmaxiso}
|
||||
We have the following situation:
|
||||
% https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsNCxbMCwwLCJYIl0sWzEsMSwiWF97bn0iXSxbMSwyLCJYX3tuLTF9Il0sWzIsMSwiWSJdLFswLDEsIlxccGlfe259Il0sWzEsMiwiXFx0ZXh0e2lzb21ldHJpY30iLDFdLFswLDIsIlxccGlfe24tMX0iLDIseyJjdXJ2ZSI6Mn1dLFswLDMsIlxccGknIiwwLHsiY3VydmUiOi0zfV0sWzMsMSwiaCIsMix7InN0eWxlIjp7ImJvZHkiOnsibmFtZSI6ImRhc2hlZCJ9fX1dLFszLDIsIlxcb3ZlcmxpbmV7Z30sIFxcdGV4dHsgbWF4LiBpc29tLn0iLDAseyJjdXJ2ZSI6LTJ9XV0=
|
||||
\[\begin{tikzcd}
|
||||
X \\
|
||||
& {X_{n}} & Y \\
|
||||
& {X_{n-1}}
|
||||
\arrow["{\pi_{n}}", from=1-1, to=2-2]
|
||||
\arrow["{\text{isometric}}"{description}, from=2-2, to=3-2]
|
||||
\arrow["{\pi_{n-1}}"', curve={height=12pt}, from=1-1, to=3-2]
|
||||
\arrow["{\pi'}", curve={height=-18pt}, from=1-1, to=2-3]
|
||||
\arrow["h"', dashed, from=2-3, to=2-2]
|
||||
\arrow["{\overline{g}, \text{ max. isom.}}", curve={height=-12pt}, from=2-3, to=3-2]
|
||||
\end{tikzcd}\]
|
||||
|
||||
We want to show that this tower is normal,
|
||||
i.e.~the isometric extensions are maximal isometric extension.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $Y$ be a maximal isometric extension of $X_{n-1}$ in $X$
|
||||
and let $\overline{g} = \pi^n_{n-1} \circ h$. % factor map?
|
||||
We need to show that $h$ is an isomorphism.
|
||||
Towards a contradiction assume that $h$ is not an isomorphism.
|
||||
Then there are $x,x' \in X$ with
|
||||
$\pi'(x) \neq \pi'(x')$ but $\pi_n(x) = \pi_n(x') =t \in X_n$.
|
||||
Then $h^{-1}(t) \ni \pi'(x), \pi'(x')$.
|
||||
|
||||
By a \yaref{lem:lec20:1}
|
||||
there is a sequence $(x_k)$ in $X$
|
||||
with $\pi_{n-1}(x_k) = \pi_{n-1}(x) = \pi_{n-1}(x')$ for all $k$,
|
||||
such that $F(x_k, x) \to 0$ and $F(x_k, x') \to 0$.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\rho$ be a metric witnessing that $\overline{g}$
|
||||
is an isometric extension,
|
||||
i.e.~
|
||||
$\rho$ is defined on $\bigcup_{x \in X_{n-1}} (\overline{g}^{-1}(x))^2 \overset{\text{closed}}{\subseteq} Y \times Y$,
|
||||
continuous and $\rho(Ta, Tb) = \rho(a,b)$ for $\overline{g}(a) = \overline{g}(b)$.
|
||||
|
||||
For $a,b \in X$ such that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\overline{g}(\pi'(a)) = \overline{g}(\pi'(b))
|
||||
\]
|
||||
define
|
||||
\[
|
||||
R(a,b) \coloneqq \rho(\pi'(a), \pi'(b)).
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item For any two out of $x,x',(x_k)$, $R$ is defined.
|
||||
\item $R(x,x_k) = R(\tau^m x, \tau^m x_k)$ for all $m$.
|
||||
\item $F(x,x_k) \xrightarrow{k\to \infty} 0$,
|
||||
so there is a sequence $(m_k)$
|
||||
such that
|
||||
$d(\tau^{m_k}x, \tau^{m_k} x_k) \xrightarrow{k \to \infty} 0$.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
By continuity of $\rho$,
|
||||
we have that $R(x,x_k) = R(\tau^{m_k} x, \tau^{m_k} x_k) \xrightarrow{k \to \infty} 0$,
|
||||
and similarly $R(x',x_k) \to 0$.
|
||||
Hence $R(x,x') \xrightarrow{k \to \infty} 0$
|
||||
by the triangle inequality.
|
||||
But $x$ and $x'$ don't depend on $k$,
|
||||
hence $R(x,x') = 0$.
|
||||
It follows that $\pi'(x) = \pi'(x')$ $\lightning$.
|
||||
\end{refproof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Beleznay-Foreman]
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
|
||||
\item For every $\eta < \omega_1$,
|
||||
there is a distal minimal flow
|
||||
of order $\eta$.%\footnote{For second countable spaces this is the best we can get.}
|
||||
\item The set of distal minimal flows
|
||||
is $\Pi^1_1$-complete.
|
||||
\item The order is a $\Pi^1_1$-rank.
|
||||
In particular
|
||||
$\{\text{distal minimal flows of rank } < \alpha\}$
|
||||
is Borel for all $\alpha < \omega_1$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\todo{This was already stated as \yaref{thm:beleznayforeman} in lecture 16
|
||||
and should not have two numbers.}
|
||||
|
||||
A few words on the proof:
|
||||
Let $\mathbb{K} = S^1$
|
||||
and $I$ a countable linear order.
|
||||
Let $\mathbb{K}^I$ be the product of $|I|$ many $\mathbb{K}$,
|
||||
$\mathbb{K}^{<i} \coloneqq \mathbb{K}^{\{j : j < i\}}$
|
||||
and $\pi_{i}\colon \mathbb{K}^{I} \to \mathbb{K}^{<i}$\todo{maybe call it $\pi_{<i}$?}
|
||||
the projection.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\mathbb{K}_I \coloneqq \prod_{i \in I} C(\mathbb{K}^{<i}, \mathbb{K})$.
|
||||
|
||||
Fix some $(f_i)_{i \in I} \in \mathbb{K_I}$.
|
||||
We build a flow acting on $\mathbb{K}$ from $(f_i)_{i \in I}$.
|
||||
|
||||
For this we define
|
||||
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
||||
E_I \colon \mathbb{K}_I&\longrightarrow & C(\mathbb{K}^I, \mathbb{K}^I)\\
|
||||
(f_i)_{i \in I}&\longmapsto & \begin{pmatrix*}[l]
|
||||
\mathbb{K}^I&\longrightarrow & \mathbb{K}^I \\
|
||||
x &\longmapsto & (f_i(\pi_i(x)) \cdot x_i)_{i \in I}
|
||||
\end{pmatrix*}
|
||||
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{example}
|
||||
Consider the following flow:
|
||||
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
||||
\tau\colon \mathbb{K}^3 &\longrightarrow & \mathbb{K}^3 \\
|
||||
(x,y,z)&\longmapsto & (x \cdot \alpha, x^2y, xy^3z).
|
||||
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
||||
Using
|
||||
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
||||
f_1\colon \mathbb{K}^0 &\longrightarrow & \mathbb{K} \\
|
||||
x &\longmapsto & \alpha,\\\\
|
||||
f_2\colon \mathbb{K}^1 &\longrightarrow & \mathbb{K}\\
|
||||
x &\longmapsto & x^2,\\ \\
|
||||
f_3\colon \mathbb{K}^2 &\longrightarrow & \mathbb{K}\\
|
||||
(x,y) &\longmapsto & xy^3.
|
||||
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
||||
we can write this as $\tau(x,y,z) = (x \cdot f_1 \circ \pi_1(x,y,z), y \cdot f_2\pi_2(x,y,z), z \cdot f_3\pi_3(x,y,z))$
|
||||
\end{example}
|
||||
% \begin{example}
|
||||
% The skew shift can be written in this form as well:
|
||||
% TODO
|
||||
% \end{example}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Beleznay Foreman]
|
||||
Whenever $I = \eta$ for some $\eta < \omega_1$,
|
||||
then
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\{\overline{f} \in \mathbb{K}_I : E_I(\overline{f}) \text{ is distal, minimal and of rank$\eta$}\} % TODO rank = order
|
||||
\]
|
||||
is comeager in $\mathbb{K}_I$.
|
||||
In particular such flows exist.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[sketch]
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Distality:
|
||||
For all $\overline{f} \in \mathbb{K}_I$,
|
||||
the flow $E_I \overline{f}$is distal.
|
||||
This is the same as for iterated skew shifts.
|
||||
% TODO since for $\overline{x}, \overline{y} \in \mathbb{K}^I$,
|
||||
% $d(x_\alpha, y_\alpha) = d((f(\overline{x})_\alpha, (f(\overline{y})_\alpha))$.
|
||||
\item Minimality:
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\langle E_n : n < \omega \rangle$
|
||||
be an enumeration of a countable basis for $\mathbb{K}^I$.
|
||||
|
||||
For all $n$ let
|
||||
\[
|
||||
U_n \coloneqq \{\overline{f} \in \mathbb{K}_I : \exists k \in \Z.~ f^k(\overline{1}) \in E_n\}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
where $f = E_I \overline{f}$ and $\overline{1} = (1,1,1,\ldots)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Beleznay and Foreman showed that $U_n$ is open
|
||||
and dense for all $n$.
|
||||
|
||||
So if $\overline{f} \in \bigcap_{n} U_n$, then $\overline{1}$
|
||||
is dense in $\overline{x} \mapsto f(\overline{x})$.
|
||||
Since the flow is distal, it suffices to show
|
||||
that one orbit is dense (cf.~\yaref{thm:distalflowpartition}).
|
||||
% TODO REF Distal flow can be decomposed into disjoint minimal flows
|
||||
|
||||
\item Let $\overline{f} = (f_i)_{i \in I} \in \mathbb{K}_I$.
|
||||
Consider the flows we get from $(f_i)_{i < j}$
|
||||
resp.~$(f_i)_{i \le j}$
|
||||
denoted by $X_{<j}$ resp.~$X_{\le j}$.
|
||||
We aim to show that $X_{\le j} \to X_{<j}$
|
||||
is a maximal isometric extension for comeagerly many $\overline{f}$.
|
||||
|
||||
The following open dense sets are used to make sure that all isometric extensions
|
||||
are maximal and hence the order of the flow is $\eta$:
|
||||
|
||||
Fix a countable dense set $(\overline{x_n})$ in $\mathbb{K}^I$.
|
||||
For $\epsilon \in \Q$ let
|
||||
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
||||
V_{j,m,n,\epsilon} &\coloneqq & \{\overline{f} \in \mathbb{K}_I : \\
|
||||
&&\text{if } \Pi_{j+1}(\overline{x}_n) = \Pi_{j+1}(\overline{x_m}),\\
|
||||
&&\text{then there are $k_m$, $k_n$, $\overline{z}$ such that}\\
|
||||
&&\pi_j(\overline{x_n}) = \pi_j(\overline{z}), \forall k> j+1.~z_k = 1,\\
|
||||
&&d(f^{k_m}(\overline{x_m}), f^{k_m}(\overline{z})) < \epsilon \text{ and }\\
|
||||
&&d(f^{k_n}(\overline{x_n}), f^{k_n}(\overline{z})) < \epsilon
|
||||
&&\}
|
||||
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
||||
Beleznay and Foreman show that this is open and dense.%
|
||||
\footnote{This is not relevant for the exam.}
|
||||
% TODO similarities to the lemma used today
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
|
|||
\input{inputs/lecture_19}
|
||||
\input{inputs/lecture_20}
|
||||
\input{inputs/lecture_21}
|
||||
\input{inputs/lecture_22}
|
||||
|
||||
\cleardoublepage
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue