\lecture{01}{2023-10-10}{Introduction} \section{Introduction} \begin{definition} Let $X$ be a nonempty topological space. We say that $X$ is a \vocab{Polish space} if $X$ is \begin{itemize} \item \vocab{separable}, i.e.~there exists a countable dense subset, and \item \vocab{completely metrisable}, i.e.~there exists a complete metric on $X$ which induces the topology. \end{itemize} \end{definition} Note that Polishness is preserved under homeomorphisms, i.e.~it is really a topological property. \gist{% \begin{example} \begin{itemize} \item $\R$ is a Polish space, \item $\R^n$ for finite $n$ is Polish, \item $[0,1]$, \item any countable discrete topological space, \item the completion of any separable metric space considered as a topological space. \end{itemize} \end{example} }{} \gist{% Polish spaces behave very nicely. We will see that uncountable polish spaces have size $2^{\aleph_0}$. % TODO: mathfrak c for continuum There are good notions of big (comeager) and small (meager). }{} \subsection{Topology background} Recall the following notions: \begin{definition}[\vocab{product topology}] Let $(X_i)_{i \in I}$ be a family of topological spaces. Consider the set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ and the topology induced by basic open sets $\prod_{i \in I} U_i$ with $U_i \subseteq X_i$ open and $U_i \subsetneq X_i$ for only finitely many $i$. \end{definition} \begin{fact} Countable products of separable spaces are separable. \end{fact} \begin{definition} A topological space $X$ is \vocab{second countable}, if it has a countable base. \end{definition} Let $X$ be a topological space. If $X$ is second countable, it is also separable. However the converse of this does not hold. \begin{example} Let $X$ be an uncountable set. Take $x_0 \in X$ and consider the topology given by \[ \tau = \{U \subseteq X | U \ni x_0\} \cup \{\emptyset\}. \] Then $\{x_0\}$ is dense in $X$, but $X$ is not second countable. \end{example} \begin{example}[Sorgenfrey line] Consider $\R$ with the topology given by the basis $\{[a,b) : a,b \in \R\}$. This is T3, but not second countable and not metrizable. \end{example} \begin{fact} For metric spaces, the following are equivalent: \begin{itemize} \item separable, \item second-countable, \item \vocab{Lindelöf} (every open cover has a countable subcover). \end{itemize} \end{fact} \gist{% \begin{fact} Compact Hausdorff spaces are \vocab{normal} (T4) i.e.~two disjoint closed subsets can be separated by open sets. \end{fact} }{} \begin{fact} For a metric space, the following are equivalent: \begin{itemize} \item compact, \item \vocab{sequentially compact} (every sequence has a convergent subsequence), \item complete and \vocab{totally bounded} (for all $\epsilon > 0$ we can cover the space with finitely many $\epsilon$-balls). \end{itemize} \end{fact} \begin{theorem}[Urysohn's metrisation theorem] Let $X$ be a topological space. If $X$ is \begin{itemize} \item second countable, \item Hausdorff and \item regular (T3) \end{itemize} then $X$ is metrisable. \end{theorem} \begin{absolutelynopagebreak} \begin{fact} If $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space, the following are equivalent: \begin{itemize} \item $X$ is Polish, \item $X$ is metrisable, \item $X$ is second countable. \end{itemize} \end{fact} \end{absolutelynopagebreak} \subsection{Some facts about polish spaces} \gist{% \begin{fact} Let $(X, \tau)$ be a topological space. Let $d$ be a metric on $X$. We will denote the topology induces by this metric as $\tau_d$. To show that $\tau = \tau_d$, it is equivalent to show that \begin{itemize} \item every open $d$-ball is in $\tau$ ($\implies \tau_d \subseteq d$ ) and \item every open set in $\tau$ is a union of open $d$-balls. \end{itemize} To show that $\tau_d = \tau_{d'}$ for two metrics $d, d'$, suffices to show that open balls in one metric are unions of open balls in the other. \end{fact} }{} \begin{notation} We sometimes\footnote{only in this subsection?} denote $\min(a,b)$ by $a \wedge b$. \end{notation} \begin{proposition} \label{prop:boundedmetric} Let $(X, \tau)$ be a topological space, $d$ a metric on $ X$ compatible with $\tau$ (i.e.~it induces $\tau$). Then $d' \coloneqq \min(d,1)$ is also a metric compatible with $\tau$. \end{proposition} \gist{% \begin{proof} To check the triangle inequality: \begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl} d(x,y) \wedge 1 &\le & \left( d(x,z) + d(y,z) \right) \wedge 1\\ &\le & \left( d(x,z) \wedge 1 \right) + \left( d(y,z) \wedge 1 \right). \end{IEEEeqnarray*} For $\epsilon \le 1$ we have $B_\epsilon'(x) = B_\epsilon(x)$ and for $\epsilon > 1$, $B'_\epsilon(x) = X$. Since $d$ is complete, we have that $d'$ is complete. \end{proof} }{} \begin{proposition} Let $A$ be a Polish space. Then $A^{\omega}$ Polish. \end{proposition} \begin{proof} Let $A$ be separable. Then $A^{\omega}$ is separable. (Consider the basic open sets of the product topology). Let $d \le 1$ be a complete metric on $A$. Define $D$ on $A^\omega$ by \[ D\left( (x_n), (y_n) \right) \coloneqq \sum_{n< \omega} 2^{-(n+1)} d(x_n, y_n). \] \gist{% Clearly $D \le 1$. It is also clear, that $D$ is a metric. We need to check that $D$ is complete: Let $(x_n)^{(k)}$ be a Cauchy sequence in $A^{\omega}$. Consider the pointwise limit $(a_n)$. This exists since $x_n^{(k)}$ is Cauchy for every fixed $n$. Then $(x_n)^{(k)} \xrightarrow{k \to \infty} (a_n)$. }{Clearly $D$ is a complete metric.} \end{proof} \begin{definition}[Our favourite Polish spaces] \leavevmode \begin{itemize} \item $2^{\N}$ is called the \vocab{Cantor set}. (Consider $2$ with the discrete topology) \item $\cN \coloneqq \N^{\N}$ is called the \vocab{Baire space}. ($\N$ with descrete topology) \item $\mathbb{H} \coloneqq [0,1]^{\N}$ is called the \vocab{Hilbert cube}. ($[0,1] \subseteq \R$ with the usual topology) \end{itemize} \end{definition} \begin{proposition} Let $X$ be a separable, metrisable topological space\footnote{e.g.~Polish, but we don't need completeness.}. Then $X$ topologically embeds into the \vocab{Hilbert cube}, i.e. there is an injective $f: X \hookrightarrow [0,1]^{\omega}$ such that $f: X \to f(X)$ is a homeomorphism. \end{proposition} \begin{proof} \gist{$X$ is separable, so it has some countable dense subset, which we order as a sequence $(x_n)_{n \in \omega}$.}% {Let $(x_n)_{n \in \omega}$ be a countable dense subset.} \gist{Let $d$ be a metric on $X$ which is compatible with the topology. W.l.o.g.~$d \le 1$ (by \yaref{prop:boundedmetric}).}% {Let $d \le 1$ be a metric of $X$.} Define \begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl} f\colon X &\longrightarrow & [0,1]^{\omega} \\ x&\longmapsto & (d(x,x_n))_{n < \omega} \end{IEEEeqnarray*} \gist{ \begin{claim} $f$ is injective. \end{claim} \begin{subproof} Suppose that $f(x) = f(y)$. Then $d(x,x_n) = d(y,y_n)$ for all $n$. Hence $d(x,y) \le d(x,x_n) + d(y,x_n) = 2 d(x,x_n)$. Since $(x_n)$ is dense, we get $d(x,y) = 0$. \end{subproof} \begin{claim} $f$ is continuous. \end{claim} \begin{subproof} Consider a basic open set in $[0,1]^{\omega}$, i.e. specify open sets $U_1, \ldots, U_n$ on finitely many coordinates. $f^{-1}(U_1 \times \ldots \times U_n \times \ldots)$ is a finite intersection of open sets, hence it is open. \end{subproof} \begin{claim} $f^{-1}$ is continuous. \end{claim} \begin{subproof} Consider $B_{\epsilon}(x_n) \subseteq X$ for some $n \in \N$, $\epsilon > 0$. Then $f(U) = f(X) \cap [0,1]^{n} \times [0,\epsilon) \times [0,1]^{\omega}$ is open\footnote{as a subset of $f(X)$!}. \end{subproof} }{} \end{proof} \begin{proposition} Countable disjoint unions of Polish spaces are Polish. \end{proposition} \gist{ \begin{proof} Define a metric in the obvious way. \end{proof} }{} \begin{proposition} Closed subspaces of Polish spaces are Polish. \end{proposition} \gist{% \begin{proof} Let $X$ be Polish and $V \subseteq X$ closed. Let $d$ be a complete metric on $X$. Then $d\defon{V}$ is complete. Subspaces of second countable spaces are second countable. \end{proof}% }{} \begin{definition} Let $X$ be a topological space. A subspace $A \subseteq X$ is called $G_\delta$\footnote{Gebietdurchschnitt}, if it is a countable intersection of open sets. \end{definition} \gist{ Next time: Closed sets are $G_\delta$. A subspace of a Polish space is Polish iff it is $G_{\delta}$ }{}