improved lecture 17
Some checks failed
Build latex and deploy / checkout (push) Failing after 18m19s

This commit is contained in:
Josia Pietsch 2024-02-05 20:30:13 +01:00
parent f4d64527c4
commit 6c2a76d838
Signed by: josia
GPG key ID: E70B571D66986A2D
7 changed files with 110 additions and 58 deletions

View file

@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ We will see later that $\Sigma^1_1(X) \cap \Pi^1_1(X) = \cB(X)$.
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
Take $\cU \subseteq Y \times X \times \cN$ Take $\cU \subseteq Y \times X \times \cN$
which is $Y$-universal for $\Pi^0_1(X \times \cN)$. which is $Y$-universal for $\Pi^0_1(X \times \cN)$.
Let $\cV \coloneqq \proj_{Y \times Y}(\cU)$. Let $\cV \coloneqq \proj_{Y \times X}(\cU)$.
Then $\cV$ is $Y$-universal for $\Sigma^1_1(X)$: Then $\cV$ is $Y$-universal for $\Sigma^1_1(X)$:
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item $\cV \in \Sigma^1_1(Y \times X)$ \item $\cV \in \Sigma^1_1(Y \times X)$

View file

@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ By Zorn's lemma, this will follow from
\begin{theorem}[Furstenberg] \begin{theorem}[Furstenberg]
\label{thm:l16:3} \label{thm:l16:3}
Let $(X, T)$ be a minimal distal flow Let $(X, T)$ be a minimal distal flow
and let $(Y, T)$ be a proper factor. and let $(Y, T)$ be a proper factor.%
\footnote{i.e.~$(X,T)$ and $(Y,T)$ are not isomorphic} \footnote{i.e.~$(X,T)$ and $(Y,T)$ are not isomorphic}
Then there is another factor $(Z,T)$ of $(X,T)$ Then there is another factor $(Z,T)$ of $(X,T)$
which is a proper isometric extension of $Y$. which is a proper isometric extension of $Y$.

View file

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ U_{\epsilon}(x,y) \coloneqq \{f \in X^X : d(x,f(y)) < \epsilon\}.
\] \]
for all $x,y \in X$, $\epsilon > 0$. for all $x,y \in X$, $\epsilon > 0$.
$X^{X}$ is a compact Hausdorff space. $X^{X}$ is a compact Hausdorff space.\footnote{cf.~\href{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tychonoff's_theorem}{Tychonoff's theorem}}
\begin{remark}% \begin{remark}%
\footnote{cf.~\yaref{s11e1}} \footnote{cf.~\yaref{s11e1}}
Let $f_0 \in X^X$ be fixed. Let $f_0 \in X^X$ be fixed.
@ -34,16 +34,20 @@ $X^{X}$ is a compact Hausdorff space.
\end{remark} \end{remark}
\begin{definition} \begin{definition}
\gist{%
Let $(X,T)$ be a flow. Let $(X,T)$ be a flow.
Then the \vocab{Ellis semigroup} Then the \vocab{Ellis semigroup}
is defined by is defined by
$E(X,T) \coloneqq \overline{T} \subseteq X^X$, $E(X,T) \coloneqq \overline{T} \subseteq X^X$,
i.e.~identify $t \in T$ with $x \mapsto tx$ i.e.~identify $t \in T$ with $x \mapsto tx$
and take the closure in $X^X$. and take the closure in $X^X$.
}{%
The \vocab{Ellis semigroup} of a flow $(X,T)$
is $E(X,T) \coloneqq \overline{T} \subseteq X^X$.
}
\end{definition} \end{definition}
$E(X,T)$ is compact and Hausdorff, $E(X,T)$ is compact and Hausdorff,
since $X^X$ has these properties. since $X^X$ has these properties.
% TODO THINK ABOUT THIS
\gist{ \gist{
Properties of $(X,T)$ translate to properties of $E(X,T)$: Properties of $(X,T)$ translate to properties of $E(X,T)$:
@ -58,15 +62,14 @@ since $X^X$ has these properties.
i.e.~closed under composition. i.e.~closed under composition.
\end{proposition} \end{proposition}
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
\gist{
Let $G \coloneqq E(X,T)$. Let $G \coloneqq E(X,T)$.
Take $t \in T$. We want to show that $tG \subseteq G$, Take $t \in T$. We want to show that $tG \subseteq G$,
i.e.~for all $h \in G$ we have $th \in G$. i.e.~for all $h \in G$ we have $th \in G$.
\gist{
We have that $t^{-1}G$ is compact, We have that $t^{-1}G$ is compact,
since $t^{-1}$ is continuous since $t^{-1}$ is continuous
and $G$ is compact. and $G$ is compact.
}{$t^{-1}G$ is compact.}
It is $T \subseteq t^{-1}G$ since $T \ni s = t^{-1}\underbrace{(ts)}_{\in G}$. It is $T \subseteq t^{-1}G$ since $T \ni s = t^{-1}\underbrace{(ts)}_{\in G}$.
@ -93,6 +96,21 @@ since $X^X$ has these properties.
Since $G$ compact, Since $G$ compact,
and $Tg \subseteq G$, and $Tg \subseteq G$,
we have $ \overline{Tg} \subseteq G$. we have $ \overline{Tg} \subseteq G$.
}{
$G \coloneqq E(X,T)$.
\begin{itemize}
\item $\forall t \in T. ~ tG \subseteq G$:
\begin{itemize}
\item $t^{-1}G$ is compact.
\item $T \subseteq t^{-1}G$,
\item $\leadsto G = \overline{T} \subseteq t^{-1}G$,
i.e.~$tG \subseteq G$.
\end{itemize}
\item $\forall g \in G.~\overline{T}g = \overline{Tg}$ (cts.~map from compact to Hausdorff)
\item $\forall g \in G.~Gg \subseteq G$ :
$Gg = \overline{T}g = \overline{Tg} \overset{G \text{ compact}, Tg \subseteq G}{\subseteq} G$.
\end{itemize}
}
\end{proof} \end{proof}
\begin{definition} \begin{definition}
@ -101,9 +119,11 @@ since $X^X$ has these properties.
with a compact Hausdorff topology, with a compact Hausdorff topology,
such that $S \ni x \mapsto xs$ is continuous for all $s$. such that $S \ni x \mapsto xs$ is continuous for all $s$.
\end{definition} \end{definition}
\gist{
\begin{example} \begin{example}
The Ellis semigroup is a compact semigroup. The Ellis semigroup is a compact semigroup.
\end{example} \end{example}
}{}
\begin{lemma}[EllisNumakura] \begin{lemma}[EllisNumakura]
\yalabel{Ellis-Numakura Lemma}{Ellis-Numakura}{lem:ellisnumakura} \yalabel{Ellis-Numakura Lemma}{Ellis-Numakura}{lem:ellisnumakura}
@ -112,6 +132,7 @@ since $X^X$ has these properties.
i.e.~$f$ such that $f^2 = f$. i.e.~$f$ such that $f^2 = f$.
\end{lemma} \end{lemma}
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
\gist{
Using Zorn's lemma, take a $\subseteq$-minimal Using Zorn's lemma, take a $\subseteq$-minimal
compact subsemigroup $R$ of $S$ compact subsemigroup $R$ of $S$
and let $s \in R$. and let $s \in R$.
@ -128,25 +149,39 @@ since $X^X$ has these properties.
Thus $P = R$ by minimality, Thus $P = R$ by minimality,
so $s \in P$, so $s \in P$,
i.e.~$s^2 = s$. i.e.~$s^2 = s$.
}{
\begin{itemize}
\item Take $R \subseteq S$ minimal compact subsemigroup (Zorn),
$s \in R$.
\item $Rs \subseteq R \implies Rs = R$.
\item $P \coloneqq \{x \in R : xs = s\}$:
\begin{itemize}
\item $P \neq \emptyset$, since $s \in Rs$
\item $P$ compact, since $P = \alpha^{-1}(s) \cap R$,
$\alpha: x \mapsto xs$ cts.
\item $P = R \implies s^2 = s$.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}%
}
\end{proof} \end{proof}
\gist{
The \yaref{lem:ellisnumakura} is not very interesting for $E(X,T)$, The \yaref{lem:ellisnumakura} is not very interesting for $E(X,T)$,
since we already know that it has an identity. since we already know that it has an identity.
%in fact we might have chosen $R = \{1\}$ in the proof. %in fact we might have chosen $R = \{1\}$ in the proof.
But it is interesting for other semigroups. But it is interesting for other semigroups.
}{}
\begin{theorem}[Ellis] \begin{theorem}[Ellis]
$(X,T)$ is distal iff $E(X,T)$ is a group. $(X,T)$ is distal iff $E(X,T)$ is a group.
\end{theorem} \end{theorem}
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
Let $G \coloneqq E(X,T)$ and let $d$ be a metric on $X$.
Let $G \coloneqq E(X,T)$. \gist{
Let $d$ be a metric on $X$.
For all $g \in G$ we need to show that $x \mapsto gx$ is bijective. For all $g \in G$ we need to show that $x \mapsto gx$ is bijective.
If we had $gx = gy$, then $d(gx,gy) = 0$. If we had $gx = gy$, then $d(gx,gy) = 0$.
Then $\inf d(tx,ty) = 0$, but the flow is distal, Then $\inf_{t \in T} d(tx,ty) = 0$, but the flow is distal,
hence $x = y$. hence $x = y$.
Let $g \in G$. Consider the compact semigroup $\Gamma \coloneqq Gg$. Let $g \in G$. Consider the compact semigroup $\Gamma \coloneqq Gg$.
@ -164,19 +199,39 @@ But it is interesting for other semigroups.
Hence $g'$ is bijective Hence $g'$ is bijective
and $x = gg'(x)$, and $x = gg'(x)$,
i.e.~$g g' = \id$. i.e.~$g g' = \id$.
}{
\begin{itemize}
\item $x \mapsto gx$ injective for all $g \in G$:
\[gx = gy
\implies d(gx,gy) = 0
\implies \inf_{t \in T} d(tx, ty) = 0
\overset{\text{distal}}{\implies} x = y.
\]
\item Fix $g \in G$.
\begin{itemize}
\item $\Gamma \coloneqq Gg$ is a compact semigroup.
\item $\exists f\in \Gamma.~f^2 = f$ (\yaref{lem:ellisnumakura})
\item $f$ is injective, hence $f = \id$.
\item Take $g'$ such that $g'g = f$. $g'gg' = g' \implies gg' = \id$.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
}
\todo{The other direction is left as an easy exercise.} \gist{
On the other hand if $(x_0,x_1)$ is proximal,
then there exists $g \in G$ such that $gx_0 = gx_1$.%
\footnote{cf.~\yaref{s11e1} (e)}
It follows that an inverse to $g$ can not exist.
}{If $(x_0,x_1)$ is proximal, there is $g \in G$ with $gx_0 = gx_1$, i.e.~no inverse to $g$.}
\end{proof} \end{proof}
% TODO ANKI-MARKER % Let $(X,T)$ be a flow.
% Then by Zorn's lemma, there exists $X_0 \subseteq X$
Let $(X,T)$ be a flow. % such that $(X_0, T)$ is minimal.
Then by Zorn's lemma, there exists $X_0 \subseteq X$ % In particular,
such that $(X_0, T)$ is minimal. % for $x \in X$ and $\overline{Tx} = Y$
In particular, % we have that $(Y,T)$ is a flow.
for $x \in X$ and $\overline{Tx} = Y$ % However if we pick $y \in Y$, $Ty$ might not be dense.
we have that $(Y,T)$ is a flow.
However if we pick $y \in Y$, $Ty$ might not be dense.
% TODO: question! % TODO: question!
% TODO: think about this! % TODO: think about this!
% We want to a minimal subflow in a nice way: % We want to a minimal subflow in a nice way:
@ -189,6 +244,7 @@ However if we pick $y \in Y$, $Ty$ might not be dense.
\end{theorem} \end{theorem}
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
Let $G = E(X,T)$. Let $G = E(X,T)$.
\gist{
Note that for all $x \in X$, Note that for all $x \in X$,
we have that $Gx \subseteq X$ is compact we have that $Gx \subseteq X$ is compact
and invariant under the action of $G$. and invariant under the action of $G$.
@ -196,17 +252,18 @@ However if we pick $y \in Y$, $Ty$ might not be dense.
Since $G$ is a group, the orbits partition $X$.% Since $G$ is a group, the orbits partition $X$.%
\footnote{Note that in general this does not hold for semigroups.} \footnote{Note that in general this does not hold for semigroups.}
% Clearly the sets $Gx$ cover $X$. We want to show that they We need to show that $(Gx, T)$ is minimal.
% partition $X$. Suppose that $y \in Gx$, i.e.~$Gx = Gy$.
% It suffices to show that $y \in Gx \implies Gy = Gx$. Since $g \mapsto gy$ is continuous,
we have $Gx = Gy = \overline{T}y = \overline{Ty}$,
% Take some $y \in Gx$. so $Ty$ is dense in $Gx$.
% Recall that $\overline{Ty} = \overline{T} y = Gy$. }{
% We have $\overline{Ty} \subseteq Gx$, \begin{itemize}
% so $Gy \subseteq Gx$. \item $G$ is a group, so the $G$-orbits partition $X$.
% Since $y = g_0 x \implies x = g_0^{-1}y$, we also have $x \in Gy$, \item Let $y \in Gx$, then $Gx \overset{y \in Gx}{=} Gy \overset{\text{def}}{=} \overline{T}y \overset{g \mapsto gy \text{ cts.}}{=} \overline{Ty}$,
% hence $Gx \subseteq Gy$ i.e.~$(Gx,T)$ is minimal.
% TODO: WHY? \end{itemize}
}
\end{proof} \end{proof}
\begin{corollary} \begin{corollary}
If $(X,T)$ is distal and minimal, If $(X,T)$ is distal and minimal,

View file

@ -1,16 +1,11 @@
\subsection{Sketch of proof of \yaref{thm:l16:3}} \subsection{Sketch of proof of \yaref{thm:l16:3}}
\lecture{18}{2023-12-15}{Sketch of proof of \yaref{thm:l16:3}} \lecture{18}{2023-12-15}{Sketch of proof of \yaref{thm:l16:3}}
% TODO ANKI-MARKER
The goal for this lecture is to give a very rough The goal for this lecture is to give a very rough
sketch of \yaref{thm:l16:3} in the case of $|Z| = 1$. sketch of \yaref{thm:l16:3} in the case of $|Z| = 1$.
% \begin{theorem}[Furstenberg]
% Let $(X, T)$ be a minimal distal flow
% and let $(Z,T)$ be a proper factor of $X$%
% \footnote{i.e.~$(X,T)$ and $(Z,T)$ are not isomorphic.}
% Then three is another factor $(Y,T)$ of $(X,T)$
% which is a proper isometric extension of $Z$.
% \end{theorem}
Let $(X,T)$ be a distal flow. Let $(X,T)$ be a distal flow.
Then $G \coloneqq E(X,T)$ is a group. Then $G \coloneqq E(X,T)$ is a group.

View file

@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
is Borel for all $\alpha < \omega_1$. is Borel for all $\alpha < \omega_1$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\end{theorem} \end{theorem}
\todo{This was already stated as \yaref{thm:beleznayforeman} in lecture 16 \todo{This was already stated as \yaref{thm:beleznay-foreman} in lecture 16
and should not have two numbers.} and should not have two numbers.}
A few words on the proof: A few words on the proof:

View file

@ -108,13 +108,13 @@ This requires the use of the axiom of choice.
\item Let $B = \{x \in \R | (F_i)_x \text{ is meager}\}$. \item Let $B = \{x \in \R | (F_i)_x \text{ is meager}\}$.
Then $B$ is comeager in $\R$ and $|B| = \fc$. Then $B$ is comeager in $\R$ and $|B| = \fc$.
We have $|B| = \fc$, since $B$ contains a comeager We have $|B| = \fc$:
$G_\delta$ set, $B'$: $B$ contains a comeager $G_\delta$ set, say $B'$.
$B'$ is Polish, $B'$ is Polish,
hence $B' = P \cup C$ hence $B' = P \cup C$
for $P$ perfect and $C$ countable, for $P$ perfect and $C$ countable,
and $|P| \in \{\fc, 0\}$. and $|P| \in \{\fc, 0\}$.
But $B'$ can't contain isolated point. But $B'$ can't contain an isolated point.
\item We use $B$ to find a suitable point $a_i$: \item We use $B$ to find a suitable point $a_i$:
To ensure that (i) holds, it suffices to chose To ensure that (i) holds, it suffices to chose

View file

@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ Let $d$ be a compatible metric on $X$.
Consider $\ev_x \colon X^X \to X$. Consider $\ev_x \colon X^X \to X$.
$X^X$ is compact and $X$ is Hausdorff. $X^X$ is compact and $X$ is Hausdorff.
Hence we can apply Hence we can apply
\label{fact:t12:2}. \yaref{fact:t12:2}.
\item Let $x_0 \neq x_1 \in X$. \item Let $x_0 \neq x_1 \in X$.
Then $(x_0,x_1)$ is a proximal pair iff $d(gx_0,gx_1) = 0$ Then $(x_0,x_1)$ is a proximal pair iff $d(gx_0,gx_1) = 0$