replace fm
This commit is contained in:
parent
448815d852
commit
93ce9390d4
2 changed files with 43 additions and 44 deletions
|
|
@ -361,17 +361,17 @@ Equivalent\footnote{used in a vague sense here} formulation:
|
|||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proof} (HNS2 (\ref{hns2}) $\implies$ HNS1b (\ref{hns1b}))
|
||||
$I \se \fm$ for some maximal ideal. $R / \fm$ is a field, since $\fm$ is maximal.
|
||||
$R / \fm$ is of finite type, since the images of the $X_i$ generate it as a $\mathfrak{l}$-algebra.
|
||||
There are thus a field extension $\mathfrak{i} / \mathfrak{l}$ and an isomorphism $R / \fm \xrightarrow{\iota} \mathfrak{i}$ of $\mathfrak{l}$-algebras.
|
||||
$I \se \mathfrak{m}$ for some maximal ideal. $R / \mathfrak{m}$ is a field, since $\mathfrak{m}$ is maximal.
|
||||
$R / \mathfrak{m}$ is of finite type, since the images of the $X_i$ generate it as a $\mathfrak{l}$-algebra.
|
||||
There are thus a field extension $\mathfrak{i} / \mathfrak{l}$ and an isomorphism $R / \mathfrak{m} \xrightarrow{\iota} \mathfrak{i}$ of $\mathfrak{l}$-algebras.
|
||||
By HNS2 (\ref{hns2}), $\mathfrak{i} / \mathfrak{l}$ is a finite field extension.
|
||||
Let $x_i \coloneqq \iota (X_i \mod \fm)$.
|
||||
Let $x_i \coloneqq \iota (X_i \mod \mathfrak{m})$.
|
||||
\[
|
||||
P(x_1,\ldots,x_m) = \iota(P \mod \fm)
|
||||
P(x_1,\ldots,x_m) = \iota(P \mod \mathfrak{m})
|
||||
\]
|
||||
Both sides are morphisms $R \to \mathfrak{i}$ of $\mathfrak{l}$-algebras. For for $P = X_i$ the equality is trivial. It follows in general, since the $X_i$ generate $R$ as a $\mathfrak{l}$-algebra.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus $(x_1,\ldots,x_m)$ is a zero of $I$ (since $P \mod \fm = 0$ for $P \in I \se \fm$).
|
||||
Thus $(x_1,\ldots,x_m)$ is a zero of $I$ (since $P \mod \mathfrak{m} = 0$ for $P \in I \se \mathfrak{m}$).
|
||||
HNS1 (\ref{hns1}) can easily be derived from HNS1b.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1165,17 +1165,17 @@ Then \[
|
|||
\item $\#\mSpec R = 1$
|
||||
\item $R \sm R^{\times }$ is an ideal.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
If this holds, $\fm_R \coloneqq R \sm R^{\times }$ is the unique maximal ideal of $R$.
|
||||
If this holds, $\mathfrak{m}_R \coloneqq R \sm R^{\times }$ is the unique maximal ideal of $R$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Suppose $\mSpec R = \{\fm\}$. If $x \in \fm$, then $x \not\in R^{\times }$ as otherwise $xR = R \implies \fm = R$.
|
||||
If $x \not\in R^{\times }$ then $xR$ is a proper ideal, hence contained in some maximal ideal. Thus $x \in \fm$.
|
||||
Suppose $\mSpec R = \{\mathfrak{m}\}$. If $x \in \mathfrak{m}$, then $x \not\in R^{\times }$ as otherwise $xR = R \implies \mathfrak{m} = R$.
|
||||
If $x \not\in R^{\times }$ then $xR$ is a proper ideal, hence contained in some maximal ideal. Thus $x \in \mathfrak{m}$.
|
||||
|
||||
Assume that $\fm = R \sm R^{\times }$ is an ideal in $R$. As $1 \in R^{\times }$ this is a proper ideal. If $I$ is any proper ideal and $x \in I$, then $x \in \fm$. Hence $R = xR \se I \se \fm$. It follows that $\fm$ is the only maximal ideal of $R$.
|
||||
Assume that $\mathfrak{m} = R \sm R^{\times }$ is an ideal in $R$. As $1 \in R^{\times }$ this is a proper ideal. If $I$ is any proper ideal and $x \in I$, then $x \in \mathfrak{m}$. Hence $R = xR \se I \se \mathfrak{m}$. It follows that $\mathfrak{m}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
\begin{remark}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Any field is a local ring ($\fm_K = \{0\}$).
|
||||
\item Any field is a local ring ($\mathfrak{m}_K = \{0\}$).
|
||||
\item The null ring is not local as it has no maximal ideals.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{remark}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ Then \[
|
|||
Many questons of commutative algebra are easier in the case of local rings. Localization at a prime ideal is a technique to reduce a problem to this case.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}[Localization at a prime ideal]\label{locatprime}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a ring and $\fp \in \Spec A$. Then $S \coloneqq A \sm \fp$ is a multiplicative subset, $A_S$ is a local ring with maximal ideal $\fm = \fp_S =\{\frac{p}{s}| p \in \fp, s \in S\} $.
|
||||
Let $A$ be a ring and $\fp \in \Spec A$. Then $S \coloneqq A \sm \fp$ is a multiplicative subset, $A_S$ is a local ring with maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m} = \fp_S =\{\frac{p}{s}| p \in \fp, s \in S\} $.
|
||||
|
||||
We have a bijection
|
||||
\begin{align}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1207,8 +1207,8 @@ Many questons of commutative algebra are easier in the case of local rings. Loca
|
|||
% More remarks on localization at a prime ideal
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{remark}
|
||||
Let $B = \mathfrak{k}[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$, $x \in \mathfrak{k}^n$ and $\fm$ the maximal ideal such that $V(\fm) = \{x\}$.
|
||||
The elements of $B_\fm$ are the fractions $\frac{b}{s}, b \in B, s \in B \sm \fm$, i.e. $s(x) \neq 0$.
|
||||
Let $B = \mathfrak{k}[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$, $x \in \mathfrak{k}^n$ and $\mathfrak{m}$ the maximal ideal such that $V(\mathfrak{m}) = \{x\}$.
|
||||
The elements of $B_\mathfrak{m}$ are the fractions $\frac{b}{s}, b \in B, s \in B \sm \mathfrak{m}$, i.e. $s(x) \neq 0$.
|
||||
These are precisely the rational functions which are well-defined in some neighbourhood of $x$.
|
||||
This will be rigorously formulated in \ref{proplocalring}.
|
||||
%Hence the name localization.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1291,10 +1291,10 @@ Many questons of commutative algebra are easier in the case of local rings. Loca
|
|||
An element $x \in A_\fp$ has the form $x = \frac{a}{s}$ for some $s \in R \sm \fp$ and where $a \in A$ is integral over $R$.
|
||||
Hence $a^n = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} r_ia^i$ for some $r_i \in R$. Thus $x^n = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \rho_i x^i$ with $\rho_i \coloneqq s^{i-n} r_i \in R_\fp$.
|
||||
\end{subproof}
|
||||
As $i$ is injective and $R_\fp \neq \{0\} $ ($R_\fp$ is local!) $A_\fp \neq \{0\}$, there is $\fm \in \mSpec A_\fp$.
|
||||
D has already been shown and applies to $A_\fp / R_\fp$, hence $i\inv(\fm) = \fp_\fp$ is the only maximal ideal of the local ring $R_\fp$. Hence $\fq = \alpha\inv(\fm)$ satisfies
|
||||
As $i$ is injective and $R_\fp \neq \{0\} $ ($R_\fp$ is local!) $A_\fp \neq \{0\}$, there is $\mathfrak{m} \in \mSpec A_\fp$.
|
||||
D has already been shown and applies to $A_\fp / R_\fp$, hence $i\inv(\mathfrak{m}) = \fp_\fp$ is the only maximal ideal of the local ring $R_\fp$. Hence $\fq = \alpha\inv(\mathfrak{m})$ satisfies
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\fq \cap R = \alpha\inv(\fm) \cap R = \rho\inv(i\inv (\fm)) = \rho\inv(\fp_\fp) = \fp
|
||||
\fq \cap R = \alpha\inv(\mathfrak{m}) \cap R = \rho\inv(i\inv (\mathfrak{m})) = \rho\inv(\fp_\fp) = \fp
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\item[B] The map $\Spec A_\fp \xrightarrow{\alpha\inv} \Spec A$ is injective with image equal to $\{\fq \in \Spec A | \fq \cap R \se \fp\}$. In particular, it contains the set of all $\fq$ lying over $\fp$.
|
||||
If $\fq = \alpha\inv(\fr)$ lies over $\fp$, then \[\rho\inv(i\inv(\fr)) = (\alpha\inv(\fr)) \cap R = \fq \cap R = \fp = \rho\inv(\fp_\fp)\]
|
||||
|
|
@ -1651,25 +1651,25 @@ and it remains to show the opposite inequality.
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{claim}
|
||||
For any maximal ideal $\fp \in \mSpec A$ \[
|
||||
\hght(\fm) \ge \trdeg(K / \mathfrak{l})
|
||||
\hght(\mathfrak{m}) \ge \trdeg(K / \mathfrak{l})
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{claim}
|
||||
\begin{subproof}
|
||||
By the Noether normalization theorem (\ref{noenort}), there are $(x_i)_{i=1}^d \in A^d$ which are algebraically independent over $\mathfrak{l}$ such that $A$ is finite over the subalgebra $S$ generated by the $x_i$. We have $d = \trdeg(K / \mathfrak{l})$ as the $x_i$ form a transcendence base of $K / \mathfrak{l}$.
|
||||
\begin{claim}
|
||||
We can choose $x_i \in \fm$
|
||||
We can choose $x_i \in \mathfrak{m}$
|
||||
\end{claim}
|
||||
\begin{subproof}
|
||||
By the Nullstellensatz (\ref{hns2}), $\mathfrak{k}(\fm) = A / \fm$ is a finite field extension of $\mathfrak{l}$. Hence there exists a normed polynomial $P_i \in \mathfrak{l}[T]$ with $P_i(x_i \mod \fm) = 0$ in $\mathfrak{k}(\fm)$.
|
||||
Let $\tilde x_i \coloneqq P_i(x_i) \in \fm$ and $\tilde S$ the subalgebra generated by the $\tilde x_i$. As $P_i(x_i) - \tilde x_i = 0$, $x_i$ is integral over $\tilde S$ and so is $S / \tilde S$. It follows that $A / \tilde S$ is integral, hence finite by \ref{ftaiimplf}. Replacing $x_i$ by $\tilde x_i$, we may thus assume that $x_i \in \fm$.
|
||||
By the Nullstellensatz (\ref{hns2}), $\mathfrak{k}(\mathfrak{m}) = A / \mathfrak{m}$ is a finite field extension of $\mathfrak{l}$. Hence there exists a normed polynomial $P_i \in \mathfrak{l}[T]$ with $P_i(x_i \mod \mathfrak{m}) = 0$ in $\mathfrak{k}(\mathfrak{m})$.
|
||||
Let $\tilde x_i \coloneqq P_i(x_i) \in \mathfrak{m}$ and $\tilde S$ the subalgebra generated by the $\tilde x_i$. As $P_i(x_i) - \tilde x_i = 0$, $x_i$ is integral over $\tilde S$ and so is $S / \tilde S$. It follows that $A / \tilde S$ is integral, hence finite by \ref{ftaiimplf}. Replacing $x_i$ by $\tilde x_i$, we may thus assume that $x_i \in \mathfrak{m}$.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\end{subproof}
|
||||
% TODO: fix names A_1 = A_S, k_1 = R_S
|
||||
The ring homomorphism $\ev_x : R = \mathfrak{l}[X_1,\ldots,X_d] \xrightarrow{P \mapsto P(x_1,\ldots,x_d)} A$ is injective. Because $R$ is a UFD, $R$ is normal (\ref{ufdnormal}). Thus the going-down theorem (\ref{gdkrull}) applies to the integral $R$-algebra $A$.
|
||||
For $0 \le i \le d$, let $\fp_i \se R$ be the ideal generated by $(X_j)_{j=i+1}^d$. We have $\fm \sqcap R = \fp_0$ as all $X_i \in \fm$, hence $X_i \in \fm \sqcap R$ and $\fp_0$ is a maximal ideal.
|
||||
By applying going-down and induction on $i$, there is a chain $\fm = \fq_0 \supsetneq \fp_1 \supsetneq \ldots \supsetneq \fp_d$ of elements of $\Spec A$ such that $\fq_i \sqcap R = \fp_i$.
|
||||
It follows that $\hght(\fm) \ge d$.
|
||||
For $0 \le i \le d$, let $\fp_i \se R$ be the ideal generated by $(X_j)_{j=i+1}^d$. We have $\mathfrak{m} \sqcap R = \fp_0$ as all $X_i \in \mathfrak{m}$, hence $X_i \in \mathfrak{m} \sqcap R$ and $\fp_0$ is a maximal ideal.
|
||||
By applying going-down and induction on $i$, there is a chain $\mathfrak{m} = \fq_0 \supsetneq \fp_1 \supsetneq \ldots \supsetneq \fp_d$ of elements of $\Spec A$ such that $\fq_i \sqcap R = \fp_i$.
|
||||
It follows that $\hght(\mathfrak{m}) \ge d$.
|
||||
\end{subproof}
|
||||
This finishes the proof in the case of $\fp \in \mSpec A$.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1686,7 +1686,7 @@ From the fact about integrality and fields (\ref{fintaf}), it follows that $A_1
|
|||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{remark}
|
||||
As a consequence of his principal ideal theorem, Krull has shown the finiteness of $\hght(\fp)$ for $\fp \in \Spec A$ when $A$ is a Noetherian ring. But $\dim A = \sup_{\fp \in \Spec A} \hght(\fp) = \sup_{\fm \in \mSpec A} \hght(\fm)$, the Krull dimension of the Noetherian topological space $\Spec A$ may nevertheless be infinite.
|
||||
As a consequence of his principal ideal theorem, Krull has shown the finiteness of $\hght(\fp)$ for $\fp \in \Spec A$ when $A$ is a Noetherian ring. But $\dim A = \sup_{\fp \in \Spec A} \hght(\fp) = \sup_{\mathfrak{m} \in \mSpec A} \hght(\mathfrak{m})$, the Krull dimension of the Noetherian topological space $\Spec A$ may nevertheless be infinite.
|
||||
\end{remark}
|
||||
\begin{dexample}[Noetherian ring with infinite dimension]\footnote{\url{https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1109732/noetherian-ring-with-infinite-krull-dimension-nagatas-example}}
|
||||
Let $A = \mathfrak{k}[X_i | i \in \N]$ and $m_1, m_2, \ldots \in \N$ an increasing sequence such that $m_{i+1}-m_i > m_i - m_{i-1}$.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1750,7 +1750,7 @@ From the fact about integrality and fields (\ref{fintaf}), it follows that $A_1
|
|||
A &\longmapsto \bigcap_{\fp \in A} \fp\\
|
||||
\Vspec(I) &\longmapsfrom I
|
||||
\end{align}
|
||||
Under this bijection, the irreducible subsets correspond to the prime ideals and the closed points $\{\fm\}, \fm \in \Spec A$ to the maximal ideals.
|
||||
Under this bijection, the irreducible subsets correspond to the prime ideals and the closed points $\{\mathfrak{m}\}, \mathfrak{m} \in \Spec A$ to the maximal ideals.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
If $A = \Vspec(I)$, then by \ref{sqandvspec} $\sqrt{I} = \bigcap_{\fp \in A} \fp$. Thus, an ideal with $\sqrt{I} = I$ can be recovered from $\Vspec( I)$. Since $\Vspec(J) = \Vspec(\sqrt{J})$, the map from ideals with $\sqrt{I} = I$ to closed subsets is surjective.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1887,18 +1887,18 @@ Let $R = \mathfrak{k}[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$ and $I \se R$ an ideal.
|
|||
|
||||
\subsection{The Jacobson radical}\limrel
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
For a ring $A, \bigcap_{\fm \in \mSpec A} \fm = \{a \in A | \A x \in A ~ 1 - ax \in A^{\times }\} \text{\reflectbox{$\coloneqq$}} \rad(A)$, the \vocab{Jacobson radical} of $A$.
|
||||
For a ring $A, \bigcap_{\mathfrak{m} \in \mSpec A} \mathfrak{m} = \{a \in A | \A x \in A ~ 1 - ax \in A^{\times }\} \text{\reflectbox{$\coloneqq$}} \rad(A)$, the \vocab{Jacobson radical} of $A$.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Suppose $\fm \in \mSpec A$ and $a \in A \sm \fm$. Then $a \mod \fm \neq 0$ and $A / \fm$ is a field. Hence $a \mod \fm$ has an inverse $x \mod \fm$.
|
||||
$1 - ax \in \fm$, hence $1 - ax \not\in A^{\times}$ and $a $ is not al element of the RHS.
|
||||
Suppose $\mathfrak{m} \in \mSpec A$ and $a \in A \sm \mathfrak{m}$. Then $a \mod \mathfrak{m} \neq 0$ and $A / \mathfrak{m}$ is a field. Hence $a \mod \mathfrak{m}$ has an inverse $x \mod \mathfrak{m}$.
|
||||
$1 - ax \in \mathfrak{m}$, hence $1 - ax \not\in A^{\times}$ and $a $ is not al element of the RHS.
|
||||
|
||||
Conversely, let $a \in A$ belong to all $\fm \in \mSpec A$. If there exists $x \in A$ such that $1 - ax \not\in A^{\times }$ then $(1-ax) A$ was a proper ideal in $A$, hence contained in a maximal ideal $\fm$. As $a \in \fm, 1 = (1-ax) + ax \in \fm$, a contradiction.
|
||||
Hence every element of $\bigcap_{\fm \in \mSpec A} \fm$ belongs to the right hand side.
|
||||
Conversely, let $a \in A$ belong to all $\mathfrak{m} \in \mSpec A$. If there exists $x \in A$ such that $1 - ax \not\in A^{\times }$ then $(1-ax) A$ was a proper ideal in $A$, hence contained in a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$. As $a \in \mathfrak{m}, 1 = (1-ax) + ax \in \mathfrak{m}$, a contradiction.
|
||||
Hence every element of $\bigcap_{\mathfrak{m} \in \mSpec A} \mathfrak{m}$ belongs to the right hand side.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{example}
|
||||
If $A$ is a local ring, then $\rad(A) = \fm_A$.
|
||||
If $A$ is a local ring, then $\rad(A) = \mathfrak{m}_A$.
|
||||
\end{example}
|
||||
\begin{example}
|
||||
If $A$ is a PID with infinitely many multiplicative equivalence classes of prime elements (e.g. $\Z$ of $\mathfrak{k}[X]$), then $\rad(A) = \{0\}$:
|
||||
|
|
@ -2748,10 +2748,10 @@ If $X$ is a set, then $\cB \se \cP(X)$ is a base for some topology on $X$ iff $X
|
|||
\subsubsection{The local ring of an affine variety}
|
||||
\begin{definition}
|
||||
If $X$ is a variety, the stalk $\cO_{X,x}$ of the structure sheaf at $x$ is called the \vocab{local ring} of $X$ at $x$.
|
||||
This is indeed a local ring, with maximal ideal $\fm_x = \{f \in \cO_{X,x} | f(x) = 0\}$.
|
||||
This is indeed a local ring, with maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}_x = \{f \in \cO_{X,x} | f(x) = 0\}$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By \ref{localring} it suffices to show that $\fm_x$ is a proper ideal, which is trivial, and that the elements of $\cO_{X,x} \sm \fm_x$ are units in $\cO_{X,x}$.
|
||||
By \ref{localring} it suffices to show that $\mathfrak{m}_x$ is a proper ideal, which is trivial, and that the elements of $\cO_{X,x} \sm \mathfrak{m}_x$ are units in $\cO_{X,x}$.
|
||||
Let $g = (U, \gamma)/\sim \in \cO_{X,x}$ and $g(x) \neq 0$.
|
||||
$\gamma$ is Zariski continuous (first point of \ref{localinverse}). Thus $V(\gamma)$ is closed. By replacing $U$ by $U \sm V(\gamma)$ we may assume that $\gamma$ vanishes nowhere on $U$.
|
||||
By the third point of \ref{localinverse} we have $\gamma \in \cO_X(U)^{\times}$.
|
||||
|
|
@ -2760,34 +2760,34 @@ If $X$ is a set, then $\cB \se \cP(X)$ is a base for some topology on $X$ iff $X
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}\label{proplocalring}
|
||||
Let $X = \Va(I) \se \mathfrak{k}^n$ be equipped with its usual structure sheaf, where $I = \sqrt{I} \se R = \mathfrak{k}[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$ . Let $x \in X$ and $A = \cO_X(X) \cong R / I$.
|
||||
$\{P \in R | P(x) = 0\} \text{\reflectbox{$\coloneqq$}} \fn_x \se R$ is maximal, $I \se \fn_x$ and $\fm_x \coloneqq \fn_x / I$ is the maximal ideal of elements of $A$ vanishing at $x$.
|
||||
If $\lambda \in A \sm \fm_x$, we have $\lambda_x \in \cO_{X,x}^{\times}$, where $\lambda_x$ denotes the image under $A \cong \cO_X(X) \to \cO_{X,x}$.
|
||||
By the universal property of the localization, there exists a unique ring homomorphism $A_{\fm_x} \xrightarrow{\iota} \cO_{X,x}$
|
||||
$\{P \in R | P(x) = 0\} \text{\reflectbox{$\coloneqq$}} \fn_x \se R$ is maximal, $I \se \fn_x$ and $\mathfrak{m}_x \coloneqq \fn_x / I$ is the maximal ideal of elements of $A$ vanishing at $x$.
|
||||
If $\lambda \in A \sm \mathfrak{m}_x$, we have $\lambda_x \in \cO_{X,x}^{\times}$, where $\lambda_x$ denotes the image under $A \cong \cO_X(X) \to \cO_{X,x}$.
|
||||
By the universal property of the localization, there exists a unique ring homomorphism $A_{\mathfrak{m}_x} \xrightarrow{\iota} \cO_{X,x}$
|
||||
such that
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\begin{tikzcd}
|
||||
A \arrow{r}{} \arrow{d}{\lambda \mapsto \lambda_x} & A_{\fm_x} \arrow[dotted, bend left]{ld}{\Eone \iota} \\
|
||||
A \arrow{r}{} \arrow{d}{\lambda \mapsto \lambda_x} & A_{\mathfrak{m}_x} \arrow[dotted, bend left]{ld}{\Eone \iota} \\
|
||||
\cO_{X,x}
|
||||
\end{tikzcd}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
commutes.
|
||||
|
||||
The morphism $A_{\fm_x}\xrightarrow{\iota} \cO_{X,x}$ is an isomorphism.
|
||||
The morphism $A_{\mathfrak{m}_x}\xrightarrow{\iota} \cO_{X,x}$ is an isomorphism.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
To show surjectivity, let $\ell = (U, \lambda) / \sim \in \cO_{X,x}$, where $U$ is an open neighbourhood of $x$ in $X$.
|
||||
We have $X \sm U = V(J)$ where $J \se A$ is an ideal. As $x \in U$ there is $f \in J$ with $f(x) \neq 0$. Replacing $U $ by $X \sm V(f)$ we may assume $U = X \sm V(f)$.
|
||||
By \ref{oxulocaf}, $\cO_X(U) \cong A_f$, and $\lambda = f^{-n}\vartheta$ for some $n \in \N$ and $\vartheta \in A$.
|
||||
Then $\ell = \iota(f^{-n} \vartheta)$ where the last fraction is taken in $A_{\fm_x}$.
|
||||
Then $\ell = \iota(f^{-n} \vartheta)$ where the last fraction is taken in $A_{\mathfrak{m}_x}$.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\lambda = \frac{\vartheta}{g} \in A_{\fm_x}$ with $\iota(\lambda) = 0$.
|
||||
Let $\lambda = \frac{\vartheta}{g} \in A_{\mathfrak{m}_x}$ with $\iota(\lambda) = 0$.
|
||||
It is easy to see that $\iota(\lambda) = (X \sm V(g), \frac{\vartheta}{g}) / \sim $.
|
||||
Thus there is an open neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ in $X \sm V(g)$ such that $\vartheta$ vanishes on $U$.
|
||||
Similar as before there is $h \in A$ with $h(x) \neq 0$ and $W = X \sm V(h) \se U$.
|
||||
By the isomorphism $\cO_X(W) \cong A_h$, there is $n \in \N$ with $h^{n}\vartheta = 0$ in $A$. Since $h \not\in \fm_x$, $h$ is a unit and the image of $\vartheta$ in $A_{\fm_x}$ vanishes, implying $\lambda = 0$.
|
||||
By the isomorphism $\cO_X(W) \cong A_h$, there is $n \in \N$ with $h^{n}\vartheta = 0$ in $A$. Since $h \not\in \mathfrak{m}_x$, $h$ is a unit and the image of $\vartheta$ in $A_{\mathfrak{m}_x}$ vanishes, implying $\lambda = 0$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
\subsubsection{Intersection multiplicities and Bezout's theorem}
|
||||
\begin{definition}
|
||||
|
|
@ -2834,7 +2834,7 @@ Let $I_x(G,H) \se \cO_{\bP^2,x}$ denote the ideal generated by $\gamma_x$ and $\
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item[HNS2 $\implies$ HNS1b] Let $I \se \mathfrak{l}[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$. $I \se \fm$ maximal. $R / \fm$ is isomorphic to a field extension of $\mathfrak{l}$. Finite by HNS2.
|
||||
\item[HNS2 $\implies$ HNS1b] Let $I \se \mathfrak{l}[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$. $I \se \mathfrak{m}$ maximal. $R / \mathfrak{m}$ is isomorphic to a field extension of $\mathfrak{l}$. Finite by HNS2.
|
||||
\item[NNT $\implies$ HNS2] Apply NNT to $L / K$ $\leadsto$ alg. independent $a_i$ such that $L$ is finite over the image of $K[X_1,\ldots,X_n] \xrightarrow{\ev_a} L$ ($\ev_a : P \to P(a_1,\ldots,a_n)$).
|
||||
$\ev_a(K[X_1,\ldots,X_n])$ is a field by fact about integrality and fields \ref{fintaf}. Hence $n = 0$ and $L / K$ is finite.
|
||||
\item[UNCHNS2] $K$ uncountable, $L / K$ fin. type. Then $\dim_K L$ is countable. Suppose $l \in L$ is not integral. Then $K(l) \cong K(T)$ and $\dim_K L \ge \dim_K K(T) \ge \aleph_1$.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
|
|||
\DeclareMathOperator{\hght}{ht}
|
||||
\newcommand{\Wlog}{W.l.o.g. }
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\fri}{\ensuremath\mathfrak{i}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\fm}{\ensuremath\mathfrak{m}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\Vspec}{\ensuremath V_{\mathbb{S}}}%\Spec}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\Vs}{\ensuremath V_{\mathbb{S}}}%\Spec}}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue